8. Juni 2019: Ringnebel, Galaxien

Since I still received relatively poor results when working on the galaxies, I had planned to make a few attempts with the medium-gain setting of the camera. As a result, I hoped for much brighter images.
The images of the two galaxies (M 51 and M 101) were not really good. But the Ring Nebula came a little better than the first attempt a week ago. June 8, 2019: Ring Nebula (M 57)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Starizona HyperStar 11 V4

Image
December 26, 2020 was finally a clear night. Of course, I finally wanted to try the Hyperstar V4 with the Celestron 11 EdgeHD. So I tried it first with the Orion Nebula (M 42). Already after short exposure times the nebula stood out well. Nevertheless I worked with 30s exposure time (as I had done before with f6.3 and f10). So I hoped to capture more details on the one hand, and the image was not overexposed yet. Raw image stacked in Atik Infinity software (Atik Horizon OSC, 90 frames at 30s low gain) This is the raw image which the Atik Infinity software had stacked. You can clearly see how the stars are quite round in the center and look more and more like small comets towards the edge. This indicates that the sensor of the camera was too close to the optics. That means I will have to position the camera a bit further away in the future. Although the raw material is not convincing, I still stacked and processed it with PixInsight. Interestingly, the effect with the comet-like stars w...
Read more

Orion Nebula January 21, 2020

Image
On January 21st I wanted to try the new heating tape to see if the optics still fog up after a short time. So I connected it to the SteelDrive II and aligned the telescope with the Orion nebula. I then took 144 pictures with 30s exposure time each. In the good 70 minutes, the optics only fogged up slightly, without a heating tape it was fogged up every 15 to 20 minutes. The stacked live image of the Atik Inifity software already looked pretty good. Orion Nebula: 144 images 30s stacked with Atik Infinity software I then edited the images with PixInsight. This means preprocessing with biases and darks, then stacked, photometric color correction and then a histogram transformation. Orion Nebula: The same images edited with PixInsight The difference is clearly visible. However, a lot would still be possible. But PixInsight is so extensive and complex that I still have to practice a little. You can also see the vignetting of the optics, so next time I have to work with ...
Read more

Accuracy of the Advanced VX mount

So far, I've done all the alignments with a standard 17mm eyepiece. This is of course not so accurate, because it is difficult to estimate whether the object is now exactly in the middle. Nevertheless, all approached objects were visible in the eyepiece. But when I wanted to take pictures of Mars with the Celestron NexImage 10, it was not visible on the picture, but just next to it. With a chip size of 6.4 x 4.6 mm, the image field is also very limited. That's why I first did an alignment with the StarSense, then the StarSense was readjusted with the reticule eyepiece. Then again an alignment with the StarSense and then einnorden with the crosshair eyepiece. Then again a new alignment with additional reference stars to increase the accuracy. I hit some objects (Orion Nebula, Crab Nebula, Bode Galaxy) and they were all very well centered. If you set everything up well then the accuracy is really good.
Read more